Difference between revisions of "Category:North-South non-cognates"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ben Barrett (talk | contribs) (Created page with "This page lists {{NPS}} and {{SPS}} words for which the equivalent in the other dialect does not appear to be related. However, {{dialect | NPS}} '''ʔukʷukʷ''' and {{d...") |
Ben Barrett (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This page lists {{NPS}} and {{SPS}} words for which the equivalent in the other dialect does not appear to be related. | This page lists {{NPS}} and {{SPS}} words for which the equivalent in the other dialect does not appear to be related. | ||
For example, {{dialect | NPS}} '''[[ʔukʷukʷ]]''' and {{dialect | SPS}} '''[[č̓aʔa]]''' do not appear to be related (do not appear to be cognates) and therefore are listed. | |||
In contrast, {{dialect | NPS}} '''[[bədaʔ]]''' and {{dialect | SPS}} '''[[bədəʔ]]''' are clearly related (are cognates) and are not given on this page. | In contrast, {{dialect | NPS}} '''[[bədaʔ]]''' and {{dialect | SPS}} '''[[bədəʔ]]''' are clearly related (are cognates) and are not given on this page. | ||
[[Category:dialect variations]] | [[Category:dialect variations]] |
Latest revision as of 07:11, 17 March 2017
This page lists Northern and Southern words for which the equivalent in the other dialect does not appear to be related.
For example, (Northern) ʔukʷukʷ and (Southern) č̓aʔa do not appear to be related (do not appear to be cognates) and therefore are listed.
In contrast, (Northern) bədaʔ and (Southern) bədəʔ are clearly related (are cognates) and are not given on this page.