Difference between revisions of "be"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ben Barrett (talk | contribs) (Created page with "There is no {{PS}} word corresponding to the English verb "to be," whose conjugations include, am, are, is, was, were and been. <br> {{SM}} * {{Book I}}, chapter 1 Categor...") |
Ben Barrett (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* {{Book I}}, chapter 1 | * {{Book I}}, chapter 1 | ||
[[Category:English verbs]] | [[Category:English verbs]] [[Category:Book I, chapter 1]] | ||
Revision as of 09:28, 11 February 2017
There is no Lushootseed word corresponding to the English verb "to be," whose conjugations include, am, are, is, was, were and been.
Number of times this entry has been verified against the sources, including at the time of creation: 1
In general, an entry with a higher number of verifications and sources may be considered more reliable.
sources
- 1995, Thom Hess and Vi [taqʷšəblu] Hilbert, Lushootseed: The language of the Skagit Nisqually, and other tribes of Puget Sound, an Introduction: Book I, Lushootseed Press, chapter 1