Difference between revisions of "be"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Ben Barrett (talk | contribs) |
Ben Barrett (talk | contribs) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{entry lang|EN}} | |||
{{entry pos|N}} | |||
{{translation lang|PS}} | |||
{{DE box | 1 = <nowiki/> | {{DE box | 1 = <nowiki/> | ||
# (the copula, a verb indicating that two nouns are equivalent) | |||
#:* spaʔc tiʔiɫ. | #:* spaʔc tiʔiɫ. | ||
#:: That is a bear. | #:: That '''is''' a bear. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{usage|There is no {{PS}} word corresponding to the English verb "to be," whose conjugations include, am, are, is, was, were and been.}} | |||
{{SM}} | |||
* {{Book I}}, chapter 1 | * {{Book I}}, chapter 1 | ||
[[Category:English verbs]] [[Category:Book I, chapter 1]] | [[Category:English verbs]] [[Category:Book I, chapter 1 (English)]] |
Latest revision as of 07:23, 14 March 2017
usage notes: There is no Lushootseed word corresponding to the English verb "to be," whose conjugations include, am, are, is, was, were and been.
Number of times this entry has been verified against the sources, including at the time of creation: 1
In general, an entry with a higher number of verifications and sources may be considered more reliable.
sources
- 1995, Thom Hess and Vi [taqʷšəblu] Hilbert, Lushootseed: The language of the Skagit Nisqually, and other tribes of Puget Sound, an Introduction: Book I, Lushootseed Press, chapter 1